Donald Trump’s Desire to Buy Greenland: What’s the Price ?
US President-elect Donald Trump has reignited his interest in acquiring Greenland, a self-governing territory of Denmark, with a proposed cost ranging from $12.5 billion to $77 billion. This price estimate, based on the economic valuation of the US Virgin Islands and Alaska, has been provided by David Barker, a real estate developer and former economist at the New York Federal Reserve. Barker adjusted these valuations for inflation and economic growth, as reported by The New York Times.
US President-elect Donald Trump has reignited his interest in acquiring Greenland, a self-governing territory of Denmark, with a proposed cost ranging from $12.5 billion to $77 billion. This price estimate, based on the economic valuation of the US Virgin Islands and Alaska, has been provided by David Barker, a real estate developer and former economist at the New York Federal Reserve. Barker adjusted these valuations for inflation and economic growth, as reported by The New York Times.
Trump’s interest in Greenland dates back to 2019 when he first proposed the idea of the United States purchasing the territory. Greenland’s strategic location, especially its proximity to the Arctic, has made it an asset for the US, particularly during the Cold War era. In fact, in 1946, President Harry Truman offered $100 million in gold to Denmark to buy Greenland, but the Danish government declined the proposal.
While the idea of one country purchasing territory from another may seem unusual, history offers some precedents. The United States has previously acquired territories such as Louisiana, Alaska, and the US Virgin Islands through purchase deals. Barker noted that the value of Greenland could increase if its role in US defense is taken into account, especially given its geographical proximity to the Arctic region. However, the value would also be determined by its mineral resources, such as copper, lithium, and rare earth minerals, crucial for industries like battery production.
A Financial Times report suggested that Greenland’s resources, particularly its untapped mineral wealth, could be worth up to $1.1 trillion. But Barker has dismissed this estimate as overly optimistic, pointing out that while the US could extract these resources, the companies doing so would need to cover their own costs and profits, meaning the full value would not be realized by the US alone.
Despite the potential monetary value, acquiring Greenland would not be a simple transaction. One significant obstacle is the island’s residents, who are likely to resist any change in sovereignty. Greenland’s Prime Minister, Mute Bourup Egede, has made it clear that Greenland is “not for sale and will never be for sale,” expressing the territorial government’s firm stance on the issue.
Assessing the value of Greenland is complex. While the territory’s GDP is around $3.236 billion, its true worth extends far beyond its current economic output. The untapped natural resources, coupled with its strategic location for military operations and its geopolitical importance as a NATO ally, all add to its long-term value.
Moreover, Greenland’s value is bolstered by factors like quality of life, infrastructure, and future economic potential. The territory holds significant reserves of minerals like copper and lithium, which are becoming increasingly important in the global shift towards electric vehicles and renewable energy. These resources could play a pivotal role in shaping Greenland’s future economic significance.
In addition to strategic and economic considerations, political factors would make any attempt to purchase Greenland incredibly complicated. Trump’s administration has reportedly considered using military influence or tariffs in negotiations with Denmark. As Denmark’s economy grows, particularly through pharmaceutical exports to the US, the leverage for such a transaction could become even more complex.
While acquiring national assets, such as the Panama Canal, is rare today, buying an entire territory remains a highly unusual proposition. National pride, sovereignty concerns, and international norms make such transactions incredibly difficult, and it’s unclear whether Greenland’s government, let alone its citizens, would ever entertain the notion.
Ultimately, while Greenland may indeed have a price tag, a deal of such magnitude would be a challenge to broker in today’s geopolitical climate. For now, it remains a lofty ambition for Trump — a potential “deal of the century” that could remain out of reach.
Sources By Agencies
About The Author
